Thread:Uskok/@comment-2008429-20170518155144/@comment-2008429-20170518175245

You're changing the subject and argueing with me in an attempt to get around the issue. The edit I made on Salazar's page fixed excessive and inapporiate use of commas. I sent you an article clearly detailing why Salazar's page needed to be fixed and why the use of commas was grammerically incorrect. You agreed with me despite being defensive, but when you edited the page you left in plenty of errors regarding improper and excessive use of commas. I edited the page to fix the remaining errors. But then you reverted it, claiming that the errors had been resolved. When they weren't. I calmy explained to you why this wasn't the case, that I wasn't undoing anything you had done and that I was simply finishing the work that you started.

Grammar issues still persist on Salazar's page and you ignore evidence to the contrary, while attempting to start arguements with me. You've had an unprofessional argumentive defensive attitude this entire conversation. You're undoing my edits not because it's what is best for the article or the readers. You're doing it because you don't want to admit that you were wrong about something. You haven't gone into any comprehensive detail about why my edits are wrong. You just keep saying they are.

Please explain to me on a grammarical level, what is wrong with my edits on Salazar's page and in what way do they compromise or damage the article?